Alice C. Linsley
Circumcision originated in what is today the Sudan region of the Upper Nile before 3200 BC. Both males and females of the ruling class were circumcised. It is not known whether the common people were circumcised, probably not. This appears to have been a practice of the ruler-priest caste called "Horim" or Horites, after 580 BC known as Jews, though some Arabs were also in this caste.
Today circumcision of boys is widely practiced among Jews, and circumcision of boys and girls is practiced among many Nilotic peoples such as the Samburu. The circumcision of Samburu boys is a rite of initiation to moran (warrior) status. This is reflected in Joshua 5:4 which says, "And this is the reason why Joshua circumcised them: all the males of the people who came out of Egypt, all the men of war."
For Samburu girls circumcision of the clitoris signifies availablity for marriage and childbearing. Until she is circumcised, she is regarded as unfit for marriage. Here are some first-hand conversations that express the respect felt for circumcised wives in the part of Africa where this practice originated.
A Somali man said: “You had better treat your mother with more respect, boy! A circumcised woman! A woman whose womb has brought forth three sons into this family! That is a circumcised woman, my son, not some loose woman who can be treated as of little account. Without her, this family would have no one to pass along the name! Now you listen: you start giving her gifts, you cast your eyes down when she enters a room; do you hear me?”
A Sudanese man said: “Is this how you speak to your sister-in-law? Have you forgotten that she is circumcised? If this is how you treat circumcised women, then does your own family mean nothing to you?"
Biblical References to Circumcision
There are three references to circumcision in the Bible that tell us about this practice. The first concerns Moses' cousin wife, Zipporah. Then Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son's foreskin, and touched his legs with it. She said, "You are truly a bridegroom of blood to me!" And when He let him alone, she added, "A bridegroom of blood because of the circumcision." Exodus 4:25, 26
This is believed to be the oldest biblical reference to circumcision and it pertains to the ruler's cousin wife. Moses' first wife was his half-sister, a Kushite (Numbers 12). Her designation as Kushite means that Moses' father married a Kushite. Likely this refers to Ishar, the mother of Korah and Moses' half-sister wife. She was a descendent of Seir the Horite (Gen. 36). So this oldest reference to circumcision connects it to the Horim or Horites.
The next reference concerns God's command to Abraham to circumcise all the males of his household (Gen. 17:10-14). This account shows evidence of the covenantal theology of a later period. Probably the source is the same as the book of Deuteronomy.
Finally, there is the somewhat ambiguous account of the renewal of the covenant whereby Joshua was to circumcise the "people" a second time. At that time the Lord said to Joshua, "Make flint knives and circumcise the people of Israel again the second time." So Joshua made flint knives, and circumcised the people of Israel at Gibeath ha-aralot. (Joshua 5:2,3)
Some translations read "children" instead of people and some read "Israelites," allowing for the possibility that females were circumcised also. It is argued that "ha-aralot" can refer only to male circumcision since it means "hill of foreskins," but in Pharaonic circumcision, the clitorus was regarded as foreskin.
The Bible offers this explanation for the second circumcision: Though all the people who came out had been circumcised, yet all the people that were born on the way in the wilderness after they had come out of Egypt had not been circumcised. (Joshua 5:5)
In November 1982, Canadian Anthropologist Janice Boddy's fascinating essay on Pharaonic circumcision appeared in American Ethnologist. The essay was titled "Womb as Oasis: The symbolic context of Pharaonic circumcision in rural Northern Sudan" (Vol.9, pgs. 682-698). Here Boddy sets forth her research on Pharaonic circumcision among the Sudanese. Among the Sudanese this practice of female circumcision parallels the circumcision of males and reflects the binary distinction between females and males, one of the more important binary distinctions found throughout the Bible.
Boddy explains: "In this society women do not achieve social recognition by becoming like men, but by becoming less like men physically, sexually, and socially. Male as well as female circumcision rites stress this complementarity. Through their own operation, performed at roughly the same age as when girls are circumcised (between five and ten years), boys become less like women: while the female reproductive organs are covered, that of the male is uncovered. Circumcision, then, accomplishes the social definition of a child's sex by removing physical characteristics deemed appropriate to his or her opposite: the clitoris and other external genitalia, in the case of females, the prepuce of the penis, in the case of males." (Boddy, pg. 688)
Herodotus (BC 485-425) wrote concerning the origins of circumcision:
"Egyptians and the Ethiopians have practiced circumcision since time immemorial. The Phoenicians and the Syrians of Palestine themselves admit that they learnt the practice from the Egyptians, while the Syrians in the river Thermodon and the Pathenoise region and their neighbours the Macrons say they learnt it recently from the Colchidians. These are the only races which practice circumcision, and it is observable that they do it in the same way with the Egyptians."
Related reading: Circumcision Among Abraham's People; Circumcised Phallus an Egyptian Hieroglyph; Circumcision and Binary Distinctions
Circumcision originated in what is today the Sudan region of the Upper Nile before 3200 BC. Both males and females of the ruling class were circumcised. It is not known whether the common people were circumcised, probably not. This appears to have been a practice of the ruler-priest caste called "Horim" or Horites, after 580 BC known as Jews, though some Arabs were also in this caste.
 |
| 3200 BC flint knife from al-Badari |
Flint or obsidian knives were used to perform the circumcisions. These often had edges sharper than modern surgical steel. Flint workshops have been found throughout the Negev, suggesting that even after the production of iron tools, the flint knife was prefered for circumcision, possibly because infection was less of a risk given the high saline composition of the flint.
The largest flint knives, dating to about 3200 B.C., were found at Hierakonpolis, a center for the worship of Horus, who was called the "son of God." Votive offerings at the temple of Horus were gigantic, up to ten times larger than the normal maceheads and stone bowls found elsewhere. These objects are found only at Nekhen (Hierakonpolis), suggesting that the 4000 B.C. temple there was extremely prestigious.
The largest flint knives, dating to about 3200 B.C., were found at Hierakonpolis, a center for the worship of Horus, who was called the "son of God." Votive offerings at the temple of Horus were gigantic, up to ten times larger than the normal maceheads and stone bowls found elsewhere. These objects are found only at Nekhen (Hierakonpolis), suggesting that the 4000 B.C. temple there was extremely prestigious.
For Samburu girls circumcision of the clitoris signifies availablity for marriage and childbearing. Until she is circumcised, she is regarded as unfit for marriage. Here are some first-hand conversations that express the respect felt for circumcised wives in the part of Africa where this practice originated.
A Somali man said: “You had better treat your mother with more respect, boy! A circumcised woman! A woman whose womb has brought forth three sons into this family! That is a circumcised woman, my son, not some loose woman who can be treated as of little account. Without her, this family would have no one to pass along the name! Now you listen: you start giving her gifts, you cast your eyes down when she enters a room; do you hear me?”
A Sudanese man said: “Is this how you speak to your sister-in-law? Have you forgotten that she is circumcised? If this is how you treat circumcised women, then does your own family mean nothing to you?"
Biblical References to Circumcision
There are three references to circumcision in the Bible that tell us about this practice. The first concerns Moses' cousin wife, Zipporah. Then Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son's foreskin, and touched his legs with it. She said, "You are truly a bridegroom of blood to me!" And when He let him alone, she added, "A bridegroom of blood because of the circumcision." Exodus 4:25, 26
This is believed to be the oldest biblical reference to circumcision and it pertains to the ruler's cousin wife. Moses' first wife was his half-sister, a Kushite (Numbers 12). Her designation as Kushite means that Moses' father married a Kushite. Likely this refers to Ishar, the mother of Korah and Moses' half-sister wife. She was a descendent of Seir the Horite (Gen. 36). So this oldest reference to circumcision connects it to the Horim or Horites.
The next reference concerns God's command to Abraham to circumcise all the males of his household (Gen. 17:10-14). This account shows evidence of the covenantal theology of a later period. Probably the source is the same as the book of Deuteronomy.
Finally, there is the somewhat ambiguous account of the renewal of the covenant whereby Joshua was to circumcise the "people" a second time. At that time the Lord said to Joshua, "Make flint knives and circumcise the people of Israel again the second time." So Joshua made flint knives, and circumcised the people of Israel at Gibeath ha-aralot. (Joshua 5:2,3)
Some translations read "children" instead of people and some read "Israelites," allowing for the possibility that females were circumcised also. It is argued that "ha-aralot" can refer only to male circumcision since it means "hill of foreskins," but in Pharaonic circumcision, the clitorus was regarded as foreskin.
The Bible offers this explanation for the second circumcision: Though all the people who came out had been circumcised, yet all the people that were born on the way in the wilderness after they had come out of Egypt had not been circumcised. (Joshua 5:5)
In November 1982, Canadian Anthropologist Janice Boddy's fascinating essay on Pharaonic circumcision appeared in American Ethnologist. The essay was titled "Womb as Oasis: The symbolic context of Pharaonic circumcision in rural Northern Sudan" (Vol.9, pgs. 682-698). Here Boddy sets forth her research on Pharaonic circumcision among the Sudanese. Among the Sudanese this practice of female circumcision parallels the circumcision of males and reflects the binary distinction between females and males, one of the more important binary distinctions found throughout the Bible.
Boddy explains: "In this society women do not achieve social recognition by becoming like men, but by becoming less like men physically, sexually, and socially. Male as well as female circumcision rites stress this complementarity. Through their own operation, performed at roughly the same age as when girls are circumcised (between five and ten years), boys become less like women: while the female reproductive organs are covered, that of the male is uncovered. Circumcision, then, accomplishes the social definition of a child's sex by removing physical characteristics deemed appropriate to his or her opposite: the clitoris and other external genitalia, in the case of females, the prepuce of the penis, in the case of males." (Boddy, pg. 688)
Found at Tel Gezer (dated 12th to mid-11th century BC)
The Egyptian word for phallus was khenen (hnn) related to khenty, meaning before or in front of
The Egyptian word for phallus was khenen (hnn) related to khenty, meaning before or in front of
"Egyptians and the Ethiopians have practiced circumcision since time immemorial. The Phoenicians and the Syrians of Palestine themselves admit that they learnt the practice from the Egyptians, while the Syrians in the river Thermodon and the Pathenoise region and their neighbours the Macrons say they learnt it recently from the Colchidians. These are the only races which practice circumcision, and it is observable that they do it in the same way with the Egyptians."
Related reading: Circumcision Among Abraham's People; Circumcised Phallus an Egyptian Hieroglyph; Circumcision and Binary Distinctions
.jpg)
5 comments:
This post simply boggles my mind. To let Boddy’s words stand without further commentary seems to imply acceptance. I feel certain you would not post a (so-called) transgendered person’s explanation of why he/she had sex-change surgery in the same matter-of-fact way, without including a comment that it is wrong. Binary distinction taken to such an extreme is monstrous. God has made men and women the way he desired them to be made. He has already made them distinct from each other. To maim or mutilate a healthy female, made in the image of God, “to make her distinct from a man” elevates man’s opinion of how humans should be created (or made) above God’s. Did not God behold everything he had made and it was very good? (Gen. 1:31) It seems to reject God’s creation as good in the same manner that homosexuals do.
The comments from the Somali man regarding respect for a circumcised woman underlines this. Does God not expect men to love and respect a woman in the physical form in which God made her? Without comment this seems to smack of relativism. I realize that in your study of anthropology you learn about and teach other cultures without judgment of that culture. But your blog also teaches your views of Christianity, making plenty of judgments on how it is practiced, i.e. women priests, homosexuality, etc. Would you present snake handling cults in America without a comment that their practices were in error? Female mutilation is pagan. Perhaps female mutilation was practiced by some in Bible times, but so were murder, rape, child sacrifice, idol worship, and just about every horror known to man. The fact that some may have done it among the Jews does not mean it was good or even neutral.
Please excuse the long post and I pray you know that my intent is not to offend, but is due only to my deep concern. I believe deeply in the Bible and Christ’s teaching. My greatest desire is for husbands to be godly heads of their households. I despise the chaos created by feminist usurpers. However, I am ever mindful of much male abuse of the female, often in the name of God, which gives Christianity’s enemies ample ammunition to use against us. Can you help me to better understand your intent here? I have learned much from your site.
Respectfully,
Lydia
My intent with this post is to provide information that helps us understand Abraham's people and how their beliefs shape the biblical worldview.
Additionally, this research supports that biblical assertion that Abraham's ancestors came out of the Upper Nile region, since that is exactly the point of origin of the practice.
(1)What is the importance of carrying out circumcision after a certain number of days, especially on the 8th day after birth of the male child?
Yemitom,
The level of vitamin K, which enables the blood to clot, is highest on the eighth day after birth.
Before Abraham's people, there were people of Akhenaton guided by Pt Seth (Sheth in old Hebrew) 4th son of Pt Noah & by Pt Idriss (Enoch in old Hebrew)of Egypt & by Pt Osir, peace unto them, of Egypt too. All Prophets of Allah, be exalted, have same law.
Why the circumcision should be of Jews?
Jews misled all nations.
The corruptions = Jews.
Post a Comment